The mail doesn't seem to have gotten through in past 3 days, so I'm resending this. My apologies if there's a duplicate.
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Craig Small wrote: > Pontus Lidman said: > > I have three hosts; one gateway to the 6bone, and two clients. > > client A can ping client B, the gateway, and 6bone hosts. > > client B can ping client A, but not the gateway and no 6bone hosts. The > > error is "address unreachable". > Who's saying unreachable? The misbehaving client B says unreachable. > > Here is the routing table for client A: > > 3ffe:200:13::2/128 3ffe:200:13::2 UC 0 2 1 eth0 > I think the C means a cache entry, whatever the hell that is > > > And the routing table for the misbehaving client B: > > 3ffe:200:13::2/128 3ffe:200:13::2 UC 1 1 0 eth0 > OK, different metric. > > ::/0 :: UDA 256 0 0 eth0 > Hmm D? You got some sort of routing daemon on this host? Nope. I do run radvd on the gateway though. > You probably want to compare /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all between them They are identical :( Also, pinging client B from the gateway, doesn't give "address unreachable", just 100% packet loss. I'm stuck :( -- Pontus Lidman, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Software Engineer No matter how cynical you get, it's impossible to keep up. Scene: www.dc-s.com | MUD: tyme.envy.com 6969 | irc: irc.quakenet.eu.org
