In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 2 Jan 2001 23:47:53 -0400), Peter Cordes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> Just thought I'd point that out, in case not everybody had thought of this > yet :) Of course I had thought of it. :-) One additional requirement that later socket must be owned by the same owner (i.e. the same uid) could be a solition as one against issue on SO_REUSEADDR option. -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP5i FP: F731 6599 5EB2 BBA7 1515 1323 1806 A96F 5700 6B25
