In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 16 Mar 2001 05:24:14 -0300), [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
> Attached is a patch adapted from USAGI that let us to bind different sockets > to the same port but different IP versions. I hope you credited us... :-p > The applying of this patch would let us in the "IPV6 Sockets Accept IPV4, > Specific IPV4 Address Bindings Succeed" class with -for example- DEC Unix > and old KAME, because we yet do IPv4 mapping. > > KAME people seems to want to deprecate IPv6 mapped address, and newer > versions don't let IPv6 sockets accept IPv4 connections. That's the MS Wrong; KAME for freebsd[34], BSD4 and netbsd support ipv4-mapped address while itojun, a core developer of KAME Project, dislikes it. See IMPLEMENTATION file in kame kit. > way too (they have IPv4 and IPv6 as fully different protocols) IMHO that's > the right approach and in a future we should be able to compile linux > with IPv6 support but no IPv4, but i'll ask the ngtrans people what's their > opinion and maybe send you a patch to do that. > I hope this is the start of a more fluid feedback between mainstream linux > and USAGI developers. We plan to start feedback in April (after my movement to Tokyo :-). Please, please give us (me in fact) more time... Thanks in advance. -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP5i FP: F731 6599 5EB2 BBA7 1515 1323 1806 A96F 5700 6B25
