On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 09:10:47AM +0200, Remco van de Meent wrote: > You mean Linux 'routers' in that case I assume... E.g. Cisco has no > problems whatsoever with a ::/0 route. Yes, Alexey hasn't played with IOS, just the Linux kernel.
> If you use radvd for stateless autoconfiguration, you'll get a ::/0 > route to the link-local address of the router issuing the RAs. I'm not > entirely sure though whether that's correct and expected behaviour. radvd, by definition, runs on a router. The clients (or whatever they're called) are not routers. So it doesn't help here. The main problem is Alexey says routers should have "real routes" and he doesn't consider ::/0 to be "real". - Craig > -- Craig Small VK2XLZ GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5 Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIEEE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
