On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 00:27, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Tim Haynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.2349 +0100]: > > > two objections: > > > > > > (a) load > > > > Not a noticeable change on here. > > you don't process 100 mails/minute.
As 95% of the mail comes from 10% of the users (most users aren't changing IP addresses that often so users == IP addresses) a bind instance on localhost should do pretty well at caching the RBL entries. -- http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
