On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 09:27, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Nicolas DEFFAYET wrote:
Hello, > > I use Exim (3.35-3) with netkit-inetd (0.10-9) and openbsd-inetd > > (0.20020802-1) on Debian Woody. > > I have no problem in such environment. openbsd-inetd works fine for me. > Of course is the backport we are talking about and not the official pkg. > > > > > Received: from unknown (HELO mail2.ndsoftware.net) (3ffe:4013::4::3) by > > mail1.ndsoftware.net with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Dec 2002 > > 20:39:32 -0000 > > > > 3ffe:4013::4::3 is not a valid IPv6 address. > > => Why Exim don't add in header a valid IPv6 address ? > > that looks strange. Are you assigning different prefixes to your boxes? > dig gives out completly different ip's for these 2 machine. > It seems like an error in the dns or something like that more than an exim > problem. 3ffe:4013:0:4::3 is on eth0, other IPs are on lo. I think that it's a parsing bug. real IP - Exim header 3ffe:4013:0:4::3 - 3ffe:4013::4::3 3ffe:4013:0:4:0:1::3 - 3ffe:4013::4::1::3 > > When a mail server is available in IPv4 and IPv6, Exim use IPv4 address. > > => Why Exim don't preferer IPv6 address ? > > If the other endpoint can be resolved both ipv4 and ipv6 then exim will do > a sort of dns roundrobin. Are you sure 100% that the other endpoint is > listening on ipv6? Yes. I don't have this problem with qmail (patched for IPv6). Best Regards, -- Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware NOC Website: http://noc.ndsoftwarenet.com/ FNIX6: http://www.fnix6.net/
