On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Martin List-Petersen wrote: > Citat Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Martin List-Petersen wrote: > > > > > Apache 1.3.27-0.1.ipv6.r1 seems to be broken regarding name based virtual > > hosts. > > > It just ignores that s***, at least if you use a "*" for the ip. Quite > > annoying. > > > > > > > I know for sure that using something like: > > > > NameVirtualHost 3ffe:100:e:1::1 > > > > works (for both ipv4 and ipv6 of course)B > > > > i will check the * sometime during next week. Anyone else noticed it? > > > > Fabio > > > > Probably it will, but i've used the "*" since 1.3.12, when it was introduced, > especially because it's a pain in the a*** if you ever change the ip of the > server to go through all of your configfiles and change the ip a serveral > hundred places. >
As I promised I did check the config using * instead of ipv6 and I have no problems, except a few warning messages that are somehow harmless. NameVirtualHost * <VirtualHost *> etc.etc. </VirtualHost> and so on .. i have somehow 15 vhosts mixed ipv4/ipv6 and i tested 4 of them. At startup i get the following warnings: [Mon Jan 27 18:40:28 2003] [warn] VirtualHost *:0 overlaps with VirtualHost *:0, the first has precedence, perhaps you need a NameVirtualHost directive [Mon Jan 27 18:40:28 2003] [warn] VirtualHost *:0 overlaps with VirtualHost *:0, the first has precedence, perhaps you need a NameVirtualHost directive [Mon Jan 27 18:40:28 2003] [warn] VirtualHost *:0 overlaps with VirtualHost *:0, the first has precedence, perhaps you need a NameVirtualHost directive [Mon Jan 27 18:40:28 2003] [warn] NameVirtualHost *:0 has no VirtualHosts even if NameVirtualHost is specified. You can also check yourself using apachectl configtest Regards Fabio
