Thanks again for previous mail.
Expecting more help from u,
Sharmila
At 06:50 AM 10/20/2004, Marc Blanchet wrote:
- your "netmask" is /80. illegal in ipv6. should be /64.
- the kernel probably sets it to /64 anyway. if you then look at your config and substitute /80 by /64, then all your hosts appear to be on the same link, where they aren't.
- use /64 and do addressing for the 2 links. example:
host1 eth0 = fec0::1:e2d2:50:fcb2:7251 / 64
router eth0 = fec0::1:e2d2:50:fcb1:de7b / 64
router eth1 = fec0::2:a4b4:11:111b:9dd3 / 64
host2 eth0 = fec0::2:a4b4:50:fcb2:4574 / 64
- fec0, site-local, is currently being deprecated. You can still use it for testing purposes, but don't plan to do a whole ipv6 addressing plan with this.
Marc.
--On Mardi 19 octobre 2004 18:28 +0530 Sharmila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I am a new user of Ipv6 and I am using the following simple setup:
Host1------Router--------Host2
Host1,Host2 & router are linux(kernel version 2.4.18-4 ) pcs with ipv6
insmoded .(Dual Stack is present on all 3 m/cs).On router,I have enabled
forwarding.
The ipv6 addresses are as follows:
host1 eth0 = fec0::e2d2:50:fcb2:7251 / 80
router eth0 = fec0::e2d2:50:fcb1:de7b / 80
router eth1 = fec0::a4b4:11:111b:9dd3 / 80
host2 eth0 = fec0::a4b4:50:fcb2:4574 / 80
Added corresponding routes on host1 and host2
Now the problem is , ping6 from host1 to host2 is successful sometimes
and failure sometimes.In case of failure,it gives "Destination not
reachable:Address unreachable" message.
Why is it behaving abnormally?? Am I missing some configuration ? Or is
the problem with my m/cs?
Also, are there are any better test tools?? Please help me in this regard.
Thanks in advance,
Sharmila
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Intoto Software (India) Pvt. Ltd.,
Uma Plaza,Nagarjuna Circle,
Punjagutta,
Hyderabad ,India.
Mobile: 9885012730
Tel: +91-40-2335-8927 / 28Ext: 210
Fax: +91-40-2335-8933
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]

