On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:20:10PM +0200, Simon Oosthoek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 07:33:10PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 19:09 +0200, Simon Oosthoek wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 06:23:52PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote: > > > > > > > > Except for the fact that one will most likely get a /48, there really is > > > > not much of a difference in IPv4 versus IPv6. > > > > > > > > > > Just out of curiosity, assuming we're 15 years in the future, I'm > > > connecting > > > my *networkbox* to an ISP and I do neighbourdiscovery, would I get a /48 > > > from my ISP (assuming it has some way of verifying my relation with them)? > > > > With current policy you should. But there is a movement of thought > > towards /56's becoming the standard. > > hmm, what's the reasoning behind the change?
Just a guess: Home networks probably won't need /48 networks. Of course, that's assuming that won't be a problem with corporate networks getting a /48... -- The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the pavement is precisely one bananosecond -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
