Hi, On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 10:53:23PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Paul TBBle Hampson wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 08:47:31PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > > Paul TBBle Hampson wrote: > > >> The best place for it is prolly /etc/modules, created by > > >> debian-installer during the insatll. Rootskel contains the file, and > > >> hw-detect populates it. (Or so it seems) > > >> > > >> So I'd put it as a bug against rootskel, so it can be default > > >> installed like 'loop' appears to be... > > > > > That doesn't seem very appropriate as it would only address the issue on > > > newly installed systems, leaving upgraded systems unfixed. > > > > I'm not sure you can really do much for newly-installed systems... > > > > I think the ipv6 addresses in /etc/hosts similarly could only be > > automatically added on new installs. > > > > I could be wrong about that though. > > Yes, which suggests that adding ipv6 to /etc/hosts is not the best
You meant /etc/modules, weren't you? > solution to this problem. An alternative, for example, would be to have > ifup make sure it was loaded before upping an inet6 address. So you think the bug report should be against ifupdown? From reading this thread I am hesitating about what to do finally (a bug against 'general', 'ifupdown' or whatever). Thanks, Frédéric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
