(Whoops, replied off-list by accident, sorry Pascal for the dupe) ---
> > On Feb 24, 2022, at 13:01, Pascal Hambourg <[email protected]> wrote: > > That should not be necessary. Okay, well, it’s the only way I’ve been able to get it working. > The direct route for 2604:5800:0:1f::/64 which shoud have been created by the > quoted portion of /etc/network/interfaces is missing. I believe you, but I’m no closer to understanding why that’s the case, nor how to rectify the situation. N
