Earlier in this thread, there was a question of how hardware RAID would handle the failure of a drive on reboot. While at LinuxWorld I asked the Intel team how their controller would handle it.
The answer was that the card would note the disk failure, notify you of the problem, rebuild the array once you replaced the bad drive and then the system would boot. Of course if you had a hot swap on line the rebuild would be automatic. It sounds like, for high availability with no hot swap, that software RAID with LILO on both drives could be a better choice. Your system would come back, although crippled, faster and be running while rebuilding the array. Seems from the discussions there is no "right" answer to which is better. A lot of factors weigh in such as availability of a hot swap, cost, availability vs. data integrity, etc. Pete -- http://www.elbnet.com ELB Internet Services, Inc. Web Design, Computer Consulting, Internet Hosting -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
