Hello all, I am running and have had very good luck with djbdns as the dns server as well as using sql2tinydns from http://www.gospelcom.net/oss These are running on a personal machine I maintain as a hobby.
The number of zones I manage isn't more than 20 or so but everything I do happens instantly (no lag) so I would expect that the performance would be acceptable with lots of zones and EVERYTHING is done via the web interface. I'm not saying that tinydns is better than bind but I like it and it works. The web interface is usefull and getting better, V0.7? will be out soon I hope this helps, Loren At 12:34 PM 4/22/2002 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hello! > >I know that this does not directly answer your BIND9 Question! > >On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 11:27:24AM -0300, Auro Florentino wrote: >... > > My priority is to cut off the shell access to non-administrators (like > support people) to modify or delete zone or records on BIND9, and to > integrate our platform on DataBase Schemas (like mantains all our > information on a storage database). > > > > Any ideas? >... > >Around djbdns http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html, there are some very >creative solutions to DNS and Database Backends http://www.djbdns.org/. > >An advantage of djbdns over BIND is, that you do not have to restart, >or reload zones when you change them. > >It is also simple to automatize tasks, like actualize DNS zone data, >with simple shell scripts which can be run sudo'ed for security. > >Best Regards, > > Jorge-Le�n > > >-- >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
