Hi, On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Russell Coker wrote: > > > I've already started work on CHAP using libradius1, which is also what the > > PPP CVS code uses. > > > > I am going to eat the code that's in the PPP CVS. When I have every feature > > of that code and more I may put Portslave in the PPP CVS. I think we only > > need one PPP/RADIUS solution, I've spent the last two years hunting down > > other options and incorporating all their features... > > But why not take the approach of taking all the current RADIUS > stuff out of portslave and going with PPP CVS then? Or are you > worried the PPP people aren't going to maintain their RADIUS plugin > properly? I mean, if you both use libradius1... > > Portslave could then become a pure 'multiport-getty', i.e. everything a > NAS does before running PPP, or another service/line discipline, as an > external program. Why not? Forget that stupid idea. RADIUS authentication and accounting are also applicable for session types other than PPP, of course. Sorry. Cheers, Emile. -- E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 | http://www.e-advies.info -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
