On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 08:39:05PM +0200, Ahton?n Kar?sek wrote:
> PassivePorts                    2000 2200
> 
> But ProFTP seem not to read this :) It's not possible to build firewall without this 
> feature :(
> Is there anybody knows, where the problem can be?

Is the firewall in question a Linux iptables one, or something 
proprietary? 

If it's iptables, then you shouldn't need to do any of this, since 
you can make use of statefulness in netfilter..

Load the ip_conntrack_ftp module if needed, and allow allowing port 21
TCP to that machine, and ensure that packets in the FORWARD chain
(assumes the firewall is a seperate machine, as it should be) are
accepting ESTABLISHED and RELATED connections :) 

Something like

$IPTABLES -A FORWARD -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT

(the syntax might be a little different, I can't check docs/google from
here..)

Then you won't need to open any ranges at all, and can live safe in the 
knowledge iptables is keeping you secure :)

Cheers,
Gavin.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to