* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Russell Coker) [2003.09.10 20:16]: > On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:04, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > ..I still believe in raid-1, but, ext3fs??? > > ..how does xfs, jfs and Reiserfs compare? > > ReiserFS has many situations where file system corruption can make operations > such as "find /" trigger a kernel Oops. > > Having a file system decide to panic the kernel because your mount options > instructed it to (ext3) is one thing. Having the file system driver corrupt > random kernel memory and cause an Oops (Reiser) is another. The ReiserFS > team's response to such issues has not made me happy so I am removing it from > all my machines and converting to Ext3.
Can you provide links to your discussions with the ReiserFS team? I'm considering using ReiserFS on some mail servers. Please share your experiences. > Also you can't have a ReiserFS file system mounted read-only while fsck'ing > it. Which makes recovering errors on the root FS very interesting to say the > least. What I hate about ext3 is that it doesn't poorly handles dirs with 1000+ files. Haven't seen if they've fixed that yet. -- Cameron Moore [ Smoking cures weight problems... eventually. ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
