> I'm currently using backports.org and dotdeb.org in production. > I am also using backports.org and have been for a long time on quite a few servers. Admittedly we only use it for things like Spamassassin and nothing hugely mission critical like kernels, but so far the packages have been of high quality. The combination of woody/stable and some updated packages (such as Spamassassin, which needs to keep up to date to date with the spammers) has been very effective. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Trusting Backports and unofficial Repositories Philipp
- Re: Trusting Backports and unofficial Repositorie... Jerome Vandenabeele
- Re: Trusting Backports and unofficial Reposit... Arnt Karlsen
- Re: Trusting Backports and unofficial Repositorie... Michael Loftis
- Re: Trusting Backports and unofficial Reposit... Jason Lim
- Re: Trusting Backports and unofficial Rep... Yves Junqueira
- Re: Trusting Backports and unofficial Repositorie... Craig Sanders
- Re: [mailinglists] Re: Trusting Backports and... Philipp
- Re: [mailinglists] Re: Trusting Backports... Craig Sanders
- Re: [mailinglists] Re: Trusting Backp... Andreas Barth
- Re: [mailinglists] Re: Trusting ... Steve Kemp
- Re: [mailinglists] Re: Trusting Backp... Dale E Martin

