On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:25, Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shared storage would be neat as we could do real load balancing on > POP3/IMAP servers as well but has anybody a recommendation for a
In my experience neither POP3 nor IMAP uses any significant amount of CPU time. Therefore having the files stored on local disks with a single CPU running POP/IMAP will be expected to give significantly better performance than having two machines running POP/IMAP and mounting the partitions over NFS. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
