On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Monday 05 March 2001 18:33, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote: > > Is there any page comparing the performance/features of ReiserFS , JFS, > > XFS ? > > > > Which one would you suggest for maildirs on heavy loaded server ? > > XFS and JFS are not released so I recommend not using them on important > servers (IE mail servers). Yes, I've already figured it out. It's all at beta-tests stage.. > ReiserFS had some fsck problems which should be fixed now, but I wouldn't > want to bet my business on it just yet. What problems exactly ? > I am likely to be installing a reasonable sized mail server in 2-3 months > time. I think it's reasonably likely that ReiserFSCK will have been proved > reliable enough by then. If not I'll get a NetApp. Do you mean NetApp filers ? > Also try out my Postal program for benchmarking mail servers. Thanx :)
