I said that IPSec was probably the "best" way because it's a standard protocol, with companies such as Microsoft and Cisco supporting it and it's supposed to be built into IPv6 if/when we ever see that.
As for how it compares, I have no idea. FreeS/WAN is the only implementation of IPSec I've used so I won't try to say that it's better or worse than any other implementation. j. -- Jeremy L. Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----Original Message----- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 3:17 AM To: Jeremy Gaddis Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (a VPN) On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 11:25:24AM -0500, Jeremy Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 42 lines which said: > Using an IPSec VPN is probably the "best" way to do it. Why? (This is a real question: I see *many* solutions but I wonder why I would choose one above the others.) > FreeS/WAN (http://www.freeswan.org) is a Linux implementation > of IPSec, but it's not the easiest thing in the world to How do you compare it to other IPsec implementations such as pipsecd? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
