My problem with the both of routers is that I cannot configure it. If I would be able to configure, I would not have problems....
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jean-Francois Dive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "�ngel Carrasco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Jeremy C. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "�ngel Carrasco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Debian ISP List" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 4:49 AM Subject: Re: NETWORK ROUTES > 2 possibilities > > remove the from statement to match all traffic and so make the route > to the outside available. > > Simply (and i bet this is the best solution), use a default route pointing > to .240.241., and use 16.16.1 as default gateway on your office router.. > > JeF > On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 10:23:55PM +0200, �ngel Carrasco wrote: > > Ok: > > > > My office network is: 172.16.16.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.16.1. > > My web network is: 172.16.8.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.8.1 > > My service network is: 172.16.4.0/24 and his IP is: 172.16.4.1 > > My public network is:213.250.143.240/28 and his IP is: 213.250.143.242. > > > > The public router is 213.250.143.241 (and only works with the range > > 213.250.143.240/28) > > The office router is 172.16.16.254 (and only works with the range > > 172.16.16.0/24) > > > > The static default route is 172.16.16.254 > > > > This is my route -n > > Kernel IP routing table > > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use > > Iface > > 213.250.143.240 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0 0 0 > > eth0 172.16.4.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 > > 0 eth1 172.16.16.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 > > 0 eth3 172.16.8.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 > > 0 eth2 0.0.0.0 172.16.16.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 > > 0 eth3 > > > > And my dinamic route to using the public network is: > > ip rule add from 213.250.143.242 table publica > > ip route add from default via 213.250.143.241 dev eth0 table publica > > ip route flush cache > > > > > > And the problem is when I try to use 213.250.143.242 in my internals > > networks doesnt run because the information goes by 213.250.143.241 and > > not > > in the normal routes. > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > > De: Jeremy C. Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Enviado el: jueves, 24 de octubre de 2002 19:01 > > Para: �ngel Carrasco > > CC: Debian ISP List > > Asunto: Re: NETWORK ROUTES > > > > > > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, �ngel Carrasco wrote: > > > > > All runs good but my problem is when I try to use the IP of my first card > > in > > > my internals networks > > > doesn't work because, all information doesn't go by internals networks, it > > > goes by the big network. > > > > Show us your interface setup and your routes. > > > > ifconfig -a > > > > route > > > > > > Jeremy C. Reed > > .................................................... > > BSD software, documentation, resources, news... > > http://bsd.reedmedia.net/ > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > > -> Jean-Francois Dive > --> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > There is no such thing as randomness. Only order of infinite > complexity. - _The Holographic Universe_, Michael Talbot >
