Visto che chiedendo in giro su ng, irc e leggendo gli archivi della ml non avevo trovato soluzione, ho segnalato la cosa a bugs.debian.org e oggi ho ricevuto risposta: la giro per conoscenza. Il problema e` il messaggio: warning: process set to nice value 0 instead of -10 as requested che compare quando lancio X con startx, sia da utente che da root, pur essendo Xwrapper correttamente suidato e con i permessi giusti.
La risposta: ---SNIP--- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#158809 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#158809: xbase-clients: get the message ``warning: process set to nice value 0 instead of -10 as requested'' at startup)] > Package: xbase-clients > Version: 4.1.0-16 > Severity: normal >=20 > Hi, if i launch X (don't care if i'm root or not), i get the message > ``warning: process set to nice value 0 instead of -10 as requested'' > as first line. This was already fixed in 4.1.0-17. It is a harmless message caused by the libc6 package maintainer changing the semantics of the nice() system call's return value while we were deep in a code freeze. He then reverted the change but I didn't have time to change my package again to revert mine. G. Branden Robinson ---PINS--- HTH HAND -- manuel `fmf' ferrero | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$%blow http://fmf.come.to | %blow: No such job.
--- Begin Message ---This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report #158809: xbase-clients: get the message ``warning: process set to nice value 0 instead of -10 as requested'' at startup, which was filed against the xbase-clients package. It has been closed by one of the developers, namely Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) Received: (at 158809-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Aug 2002 17:54:51 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 30 12:54:51 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pcp942041pcs.cstltn01.in.comcast.net (apocalypse.deadbeast.net) [68.57.244.226] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17kpyt-0003RB-00; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 12:54:51 -0500 Received: by apocalypse.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2EBA54372; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 12:54:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 12:54:21 -0500 From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#158809: xbase-clients: get the message ``warning: process set to nice value 0 instead of -10 as requested'' at startup Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qj50iofY6VFoOw9j" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --Qj50iofY6VFoOw9j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 01:16:32AM +0200, manuel `fmf` ferrero wrote: > Package: xbase-clients > Version: 4.1.0-16 > Severity: normal >=20 > Hi, if i launch X (don't care if i'm root or not), i get the message > ``warning: process set to nice value 0 instead of -10 as requested'' > as first line. This was already fixed in 4.1.0-17. It is a harmless message caused by the libc6 package maintainer changing the semantics of the nice() system call's return value while we were deep in a code freeze. He then reverted the change but I didn't have time to change my package again to revert mine. --=20 G. Branden Robinson | No math genius, eh? Then perhaps Debian GNU/Linux | you could explain to me where you [EMAIL PROTECTED] | got these... PENROSE TILES! http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Stephen R. Notley --Qj50iofY6VFoOw9j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAj1vsU0ACgkQ6kxmHytGonwhGQCfQjGUjGbt3g9emXFAMK7EJE4S bFwAn32WN1P2WSBj3FE/9KNNr+H9akdN =v++t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qj50iofY6VFoOw9j--
--- End Message ---
