On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 09:51:55AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > The main strength of the current approach is that it allows two different > implementations of SAX to live together, letting the user chose. Doing > otherwise would mean having a form of arbitration, to decide which one will > be > lgpl.xml.sax and which one will be... dropped?
Not necessarily dropped, but which will be used in the common library. This is exactly analogous to, say, the selection of thread implementations for glibc 2.0. You are still free to use some other thread model if you care to, but the default one that most people write to is the one in glibc that is bound to the kernel threads. -- __________________________________________________________________ Ean Schuessler A guy running Linux Novare International Inc. A company running Linux --- Some or all of the above signature may be a joke
