On Mon, 2001-10-29 at 14:01, Takashi Okamoto wrote: > I ITPd avalon framework and avalon excalibur which are Jakarta > Avalon's product(http://jakarta.apache.org/avalon/).
Excellent! > jpackage project uses avalon-framework and avalon-excalibur. If I'll > follow jpackage project, I should name libavalon-excalibur-java and > libavalon-framework-java. But I don't like such long package name. I > prefer libavalon-java (avalon for source) and libexcalibur-java > (excalibur for source) because upstream source directory name are > 'Avalon' and 'Excalibur'. > > Does anybody have other opinion? I'm for libavalon-framework-java et al, as that is the full name of the product, the name of the CVS modules and the names that jpackage use. Ross Burton
