On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:42:08PM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote: > > I'm not in favour of compiling on the user machine. Also, don't forget > > if the package is well done, only the native part will be compiled, the > > jars are arch-indep so they'll not be re-compiled by the buildd's. > > How so? > > GCJ needs the .jar to compile the .so. That means the jars have to be > built, but they don't have to be packaged. Am I right?
We have to package the jars. At least for all non-gcj-like runtimes which are all except gcj itself currently. Michael -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
