> Not a bad idea but those Sun's non-free API's are not packaged. I think most people using java in enterprises should be in the same situation as me: my employer wants java, and doesn't fscking care about free java. So, I usually package things for in-house use, and whenever I can, try to use the free alternatives. So, I think having non-free apis packaged is a good thing, and making it easy to switching to free (e.g. with this approach) is a very good thing.
> Also, if I follow your idea we'll have nearly a pseudo package for every > JSR? ;-) That could be very large! :-D Yes, it is... But it could grow as it's needed... We could start with the most popular ones. It is not very difficult to add a Provides: line, only the name registration is complicated.. -- Martín Ferrari
