Charles Fry wrote: Hi Charles, [you don't need to cc' me, thanks ;-)]
[...] > You seem to > suggest above creating a single package with different jars for each > JDK, though it is not obvious to me how this would work, as classpaths > would need to be updated accross upgrades (and I didn't find different > jars for different JDKs in libpg-java; are there any other places I > could look for an example of this?). It is unclear to me which of these > two packaging choices would be preferable. Building your package against different jdk's is ok for non-free jdk's, but it does not make no sense with free jdk has most classes are 1.4 compatible but not all! And when a new release comes, everyone jump on it! > At the same time, it seems that it may be sufficient to simply package > using the JDK version that is currently supported by free-java-sdk. > > Any suggestions? I fully agree! Many thanks for your time and work, -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
