On Wed, Jan 04, 2006, Charles Fry wrote:
> Well, that makes it easy, as svn-buildpackge only supports a single
> layout currently (and we certainly should support svn-buildpackage).
For what it's worth, here are my two cents on svn-bp layouts:
- it's easier to only manage the debian/ dir in SVN (mergeWithUpstream)
mode, and is really a clean way of working on Debian packages (except
it forces you to have patches below debian/ instead of directly in
the .diff.gz)
- in general, you don't grab old packages out of the SVN, so tagging
each package upload or upstream release doesn't add a lot; instead, I
found the "per-dist" layout quite useful (pkg-gnome uses a bit of
that), top-level dirs are simply:
experimental/
unstable/
stable/
2c,
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Current Earth status: NOT DESTROYED
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
