-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Charles Fry wrote: >>>I couldn't help but noticing that the virtual packages for Java runtime >>>environments are now java1-runtime and java2-runtime, while the Java >>>compilter virtual packages are java-compiler and java2-compiler. Would >>>it not be more consistent to have java1-compiler and java2-compiler? >>> >>>Charles >>> >> >>We would probably be best served by consolidating to just java-compiler, >>since java1 is so irrelevant at this point. > > > That sounds reasonable. Especially given that a quick inspection of the > most popular compilers indicates that they all provide java-compiler, > and noone uses 1 or 2. > > Would it not be equally reasonable to combine java1-runtime and > java2-runtime? [...] +1 on that suggestion as well. It has been discussed before and IIRC most of us are in favor of it. Others please weigh in with a +/-1 and any comments/concerns. A big thanks to Charles for investing the time to build our concensus on several things and move things forward these days.
Regards, - -- Barry Hawkins All Things Computed site: www.alltc.com weblog: www.yepthatsme.com Registered Linux User #368650 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDv42gHuKcDICy0QoRAmgCAJ4wGi2BfVK8/JcZsBaW8BldLlv3jQCffPPU OCoct22VJGOcY3LxtpbZypw= =lN54 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
