Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 15:28 +0100 schrieb Michael Koch: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:48:08PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
[docbook-xsl-java package for the Saxon/Xalan extensions?] > > In every case, I would appreciate your help. But if Michael Smith really > > offers splitting the source, I would prefer this way and put it into > > pkg-java (it's simple - the java guys probably have more knowledge about > > Java, saxon and xalan than I have - I have just some basic Java > > knowledge). > > This makes only real sense when the java part has no dependency on a > special version of the non-java docbook-xsl. That's IMO the case (Michael, your opinion?). It's more like docbook-xsl depending on the extensions in special parts (e.g. the callouts-list handling). The code-base of the extensions also doesn't change very often: about 3 commits in 9 years (from what I can see). > If it has it would be MUCH > easier to do it all in one source package. We can help you with this > even if its not under the pkg-java umbrella. I agree. But I think, it can be maintained separately. I will of course be near to this package in every case (maybe co-maintaining). Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
