Hi Damien, On Wed, 11 Mar, 2009 at 10:45:30PM +0100, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > Hi Varun, > > On Tuesday 10 March 2009 23:30:20 Varun Hiremath wrote: > > Hi Damien, > > > > On Tue, 10 Mar, 2009 at 12:13:49AM +0100, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > > Dear mentors, > > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.0.2-5 > > > of package "libmx4j-java" : > > > > Looks good. Uploaded. > > It's time for my first "brown paper bag release" ;( > > libmx4j-java 3.0.2-5 won't build |1] because I've made two mistakes : > > - I've moved some java libraries from B-D to B-D-I without thinking this > particular package have an architecture-dependent package (libmx4j-java-gcj). > To build this package, we rebuild a JAR file then dh_nativejava in the > "build" > target of debian/rules so we need to keep all this libs in B-D. > A pbuilder env. auto install B-D *and* B-D-I so I haven't seen this when > building locally. I'm currently setting up a local sbuild... > > - openjdk-6-jdk is not available on m68k and s390 wheras java-gcj-compat is. > libmx4j-java is a dependency of java-gcj-compat-headless which in turn is a > dependency of java-gcj-compat-dev | default-jdk-builddep. > So with this 3.0.2-5 upload, java-gcj-compat-dev or default-jdk-builddep were > uninstallable on those arch because of a missing openjdk-6-jdk. > > I'm really sorry for all this garbage. I hope someone will sponsor my new > 3.0.2-6 soon to revert this nasty issues.
Sorry, I too missed that, but there still seems to be some problem. The new package still fails to build on many archs and I am not sure why. Could you please check? Regards, Varun -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
