Le jeudi 19 août 2010 à 10:19 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit : > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Sylvestre Ledru <sylves...@debian.org> wrote: > > Le samedi 17 juillet 2010 à 22:58 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit : > >> Dear package maintainer, > >> > >> I have uploaded fop 1.0 to experimental: > >> > >> http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fop/news/20100717T204721Z.html > >> > >> I did not make xmlgraphics-commons 1.4 a requirement, the package is > >> available on mentors (I am a DM so I cannot upload xmlgraphics-commons > >> to experimental): > >> > >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmlgraphics-commons/ > >> > >> Please test if you can, and please do report any issue you may find. > > Upstream developer of jlatexmath (C/C of this email) reported some > > issues with the version 1.0 of FOP. > > He says [1] that this release has some issues with the font management > > and the way to render images. > > > > jeuclid builds against this version but I haven't been able to test for > > now. I will contact upstream about this. > > Sylvestre, did you made any progress on that ? I contacted him but I didn't get any answer. The future release, at least for now, does not seem to include the migration to fop 1.0: http://jeuclid.sourceforge.net/changes-report.html
> BTW since debian is in freeze, is it too late to upload fop 1.0 to unstable ? It is indeed too late. It has too many reverse dependencies to try this migration for squeeze. Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1282206334.11038.20383.ca...@korcula.inria.fr
