On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Matthias Klose <[email protected]> wrote: > No. This should not be done. Relying on an alternative for a build makes > problems much harder to debug, if you first have to find out which > alternative is actually used, and which alternative is used for the build. > > I am fine with improving user experience, but the change in the proposed > form will obfuscate the build process.
Niels did not propose to use alternatives for building packages. His proposal is fully backwards compatible as far as I understood it. Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
