Hi Damien On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 17:06 +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > I've the same comments as on "localizer" : I couldn't find anything > regarding license / copyright in upstream orig.tar.gz > and, AFAIK, refering to a website for licensing information is not an > acceptable practice for FTP Masters. > > Could you please contact upstream about this ?
Yes and apologies - I should have picked this up after the feedback you
gave on localizer; I've also identified a few other packages in the
pipeline that also have this issue.
I have noted that some packages make reference to the license in the
Maven pom.xml file - for example:
<licenses>
<license>
<name>GNU Lesser General Public License version 2.1</name>
<url>http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html</url>
</license>
<license>
<name>COMMON DEVELOPMENT AND DISTRIBUTION LICENSE (CDDL) Version
1.0</name>
<url>http://www.sun.com/cddl/cddl.html</url>
</license>
</licenses>
Is this acceptable practice? It still references out to an external
website but it does state the licensing within the original source code.
Cheers
James
--
James Page
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Team
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
