Le mercredi 21 septembre 2011 à 21:20 +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan a écrit : > Hi, > > Le vendredi 02 septembre 2011 03:06:47, Matthias Klose a écrit : > > On 09/01/2011 10:46 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Matthias Klose<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> why deleting the remainder of the email and not reading the email up to > > >> the end? > > > > > > JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk is the answer? I believe > > > that we will see some FTBFS problems. But maybe that it might a good > > > reason the switch to default-java. > > > > openjdk-6-jre-headless now doesn't use java-6-openjdk anymore. so with the > > appropriate conflicts, this symlink can be moved to default-jre-headless. > > Now, in unstable, we didn't have /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/ symlink or > directory anymore. What's current plan ? Reintroduce this symlink with > default-jdk package ? Currently, what I am doing now is to add "default-jre-headless" as dependency and using /usr/lib/jvm/default-java as path. I know this will probably fail on some archs but I found it easy and not that dirty.
Anyway, I think we should come up with a better solution... (probably as a symlink as you suggest). Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
