Le 30/06/2014 17:41, James Page a écrit : > So to avoid a) having to maintain forks for mdh and mrh in Ubuntu or > b) having to try to persuade the Ubuntu security team to review the > 100's of packages that putting Maven into main would mean I'm a -1 on > this proposal.
Thank you for the feedback James, I'll keep the packages separated then. This isn't the first time the lack of Maven in Ubuntu main impacts our choices. I understand the perspective of supporting the security updates of 100+ dependencies isn't very exciting, but on the other hand I don't think the Maven dependencies are affected by many vulnerabilities anyway. Who in the Ubuntu security team would we have to convince to get Maven in main? Emmanuel Bourg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
