Rory, Dalibor,

is it really necessary to have these advertisements of Oracle's binary only,
architecture limited builds on a mailing list of a community project dedicated
to build binaries from sources?  I can't find such advertisements on e.g.
mailing lists for the Fedora project either.

Thanks, Matthias


On 28.11.2017 16:45, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> *JDK 10 Early Access  build 33 is available at : - **jdk.java.net/10/*
> 
> 
> Notable changes since previous email.
> 
> <http://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175094>JDK-8180019
> <http://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8180019> - *javadoc treats failure to
> access a URL as an error , not a warning.*
> If javadoc cannot access the contents of a URL provided with the -link or
> -linkoffline options,the tool will now report an error.
> Previously, the tool continued with a warning, producing incorrect 
> documentation
> output.
> 
> JDK-8175094 <http://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175094>*- **The
> java.security.acl APIs are deprecated, for removal****
> * The deprecated java.security.acl APIs are now marked with forRemoval=true 
> and
> are subject to removal in a future version of Java SE.
> 
> JDK-8175091 <http://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175091> *- The
> java.security.{Certificate,Identity,IdentityScope,Signer} APIs are deprecated,
> for removal*
> The deprecated java.security.{Certificate, Identity, IdentityScope, Signer}
> classes are now marked with forRemoval=true and are subject to removal in a
> future version of Java SE.
> 
> JDK 10 Schedule, Status & Features are available [1]
> 
> 
>      Notes
> 
>  * OpenJDK EA binaries will be available at a later date.
>  * Oracle has proposed: Newer version-string scheme for the Java SE
>    Platform and the JDK
>      o Please see Mark Reinhold's proposal [2]
> 
> *JDK 8u162 Early Access build 03 is available at :- http://jdk.java.net/8/*
> 
> <http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/releases/8u162.html>
> 
> *Feedback* - If you have suggestions or encounter bugs, please submit them 
> using
> the usual Java SE bug-reporting channel.
> Be sure to include complete version information from the output of the |java
> --version| command.
> 
> Regards,
> Rory
> 
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/10/
> [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-dev/2017-November/000089.html
> 

Reply via email to