Le 06/07/2018 à 07:15, Markus Koschany a écrit : > Good work! It would have been nice though, if you had sent a short > notice to #681726 to avoid double work because I said I would work on > aspectj. I started to bundle the needed eclipse source code with aspectj > but I agree that working solutions are better than mere theory.
Sorry I overlooked your last message in #681726. I was merely experimenting when I started and I wasn't sure it would work. There was nothing newsworthy until now. I got lucky to pull the right thread to enter into the mess of the Eclipse dependencies. I did notice your comment in #893312 regarding lombok though, maybe eclipse-jdt-core should get the same treatment. The ecj package is tailored for the needs of Tomcat, I suggest ignoring it for now. > Your approach also looks cleaner although I believe maintaining > individual Ant build.xml files is probably quite time consuming. The Ant script is rather simple, I defined a macro building a single bundle and I then call it sequentially for each bundle. I'll probably move the common part of the script to javahelper to avoid the duplication between the packages. > Looks all sensible to me. Ok let's do this. I'm still not set on prefixing the equinox packages with "eclipse" or not though. Emmanuel Bourg