On 26 Jun 2001, at 14:23, Ben Armstrong sent forth the message: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 06:16:33PM +0100, Daniel Glassey wrote: > > This might be a horrible idea and I don't know offhand what policy > > is like on this kinda thing, nor how big it might be, but how about a > > statically linked galeon package that would conflict with gnome? task- > > junior could then include galeon | galeon-static. (er, this assumes that it > > can be compiled statically) > > Ow. No, I don't think so. The Right Thing is for me to finish these > meta packages, stop fixating on every little thing that goes in, and then > move onwards with task-junior-gnome and task-junior-kde options. Mozilla > is fine for a task-junior base. People wishing to use galeon instead can > install that after the fact, and people wishing to go the whole nine yards > and do gnome can currently install task-junior plus task-gnome.
ok, brain failure, that really was a daft idea ;) skipstone is plenty good as a mozilla based browser without Gnome or KDE. Daniel P.S. I'm subscribed so no need to to or cc me _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
