On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 01:57:17PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > I object. As much as I would like to see animals removed, it is still > in the archive - both in unstable and in testing. Having a separate > package doing the same task is *not* what we need. The maintainers of > animals and animals-games should sort out which packages stays in > Debian and this one should be called animals (since this is what users > are used to). debian-jr should depend on "animals", regardless which > package that turns out to be (the current "animals" or the current > "animals-games").
There is no maintainer for animals. It belongs to the QA group. So can't it just be killed and replaced with animals-game? Ben -- ,-. nSLUG http://www.nslug.ns.ca [EMAIL PROTECTED] \`' Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] ` [ gpg 395C F3A4 35D3 D247 1387 2D9E 5A94 F3CA 0B27 13C8 ] [ pgp 7F DA 09 4B BA 2C 0D E0 1B B1 31 ED C6 A9 39 4F ]
