On Sun, 8 Apr 2007, Ben Armstrong wrote:
[1] Although this seemed like a good idea at the time, for various
reasons I ended up sticking with the single metapackage per category
model Debian Jr. uses to this day.
What are these reasons and how can I help to invalidate them?
But I have retained this experiment
in the repository under
svn://svn.debian.org/debianjr/branches/EXP-cdd-dev in case we ever
reverse that decision.
I do not really care where the source of a project are located I
would regard it as very reasonable to at least leave a hint in the
CDD repository. I wonder whether I should stop the cdd-dev fun
having only for one single CDD while others seem to be happy to
develop their own stuff in parallel.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
