Derek Broughton wrote: > he absolutely > refuses to quote I did read one of his posts that was apparently in reply to another post, and, although he did not quote, he had enough "background" in his question/text that I thought it was easy to see to what he was responding. I think that approach could be acceptable.
Aside: I hadn't noticed that he broke the thread, but I suspect he did, which is not good, unless he's really changing subjects--then it might be a good idea as long as the new subject line accurately reflects the contents of the new thread (and doesn't leave an unanswered question in the old thread). The reason I say it might be a good idea is that it may make the information easier to find in a search of the archives. Randy Kramer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
