I've already got 2.2.18 running. However, I'm still using the user-space nfs daemon, as I couldn't get the kernel-nfs server configured. I can't recall the problem I had with it, but if the user space server is flakey, then I guess I'd better revisit the issue.
On Thursday 22 February 2001 09:52, Bart Oldeman wrote: > On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Robert Guthrie wrote: > > The only big variable here is that at home I have a separate box > > where my home directory is an nfs share. Is there some kind of > > locking problem with konqueror, related to how nfs works? Maybe > > because of non-optimal nfs setup? > > I've tried this with 2.0.1 on an nfs mounted home: no problem. > Maybe it's in the kernel: 2.2.18 has relatively decent nfs support, > but for all kernels before that one it was very slow for me and I > needed to apply special patches. These patches are integrated in > kernel 2.2.18. 2.4.x should be fine too, but I haven't tested it in > combination with nfs. > > Bart -- Did you know that if you play a Windows 2000 cd backwards, you will hear the voice of Satan? That's nothing! If you play it forward, it'll install Windows 2000.
