because I rather cause the folks using kpacke currently to have to install rpm (until 2.2 comes out in which I believe this is fixed) rather than bloat the distribution by having a kpackage-rpm, a kpackage-deb, and a kpackage-both.
It should just be modular (which it's intent is to be) however 2.1 is not and if you build with rpm support it requires rpm to be in existant in order for it to work. Ivan On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 08:46:05PM -0400, Dmitriy Kropivnitskiy wrote: > I am using the version from unstable and it definitely requires RPM. I > was wondering why the hell was RPM support compiled into it in a Debian > package. > > Regnat Nikolaus wrote: > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > I recently installed kpackage from debian/testing. When I tried to start > > kpackage it crashes. I figured out that if I install rpm (which is currently > > only recommended) it works fine. Is this a bug or have I done anything > > wrong? > > > > Nikolaus Regnat > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > > > iD8DBQE7J/OairOupgeyXZcRAnp2AJ4jgyDVy+Td6hupkK0sqsuwcMsxeACg05Uo > > e7F2O0kqJgLxBI6oXkBjoKM= > > =HCqA > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---end quoted text--- -- ---------------- Ivan E. Moore II [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://snowcrash.tdyc.com GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD
