El Vie 09 Nov 2001 03:51, Ivan E. Moore II escribi�: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 02:54:45AM +0100, Steffen Evers wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 18:40, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > > > > I have noticed that several packages are now 2.2.x, but kdebase and > > > > others are still 2.1.x > > > > > > > > Wait until tomorrow and everything is fine? :-) > > > > > > well..it depends on when kdebase makes it's way into testing. you can > > > do a dpkg --force-overwrite -i > > > /var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs3_4%3a2.2.1-14_i386.deb and get past > > > that. > > > > Does this mixture of 2.1 and 2.2 not hurt? Wow, than you have really > > done a great job on all these dependencies. I thought it is simply > > forbidden to mix 2.1 and 2.2 and that's it, but it looks like that there > > is much more behind it ... > > > > So, it is sure that I will not end up with a broken KDE by > > installing (only) half of the 2.2 packages? > > I'm guessing there will be some (most likely many) problems with 2.1 + 2.2 > mixtures...however such is the life of testing...no way around that. All I > can say is for people to either live through it or wait. > > Ivan
Will the entrance of KDE 2.2 modify "tasksel" so that there is one or more options to install KDE as the default desktop?. I guess this has something to do with metapackages �??. Now, when I run "tasksel" from woody, I can only see GNOME 3 or 4 times but no sign of KDE. regards, Pablo de Vicente KDE Spanish translation team
