-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 13 December 2001 12:35 pm, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 09:23:26PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote: > > On Thursday 13 December 2001 17:43, David Bishop wrote: > > > On Thursday 13 December 2001 08:40 am, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > > > > yes. KDE_2_2_BRANCH is followed. > > > > > > Sweet, then I'll just wait for the next release of packages. Thanks! > > > > The branch won't last too long. There may not be another bugfix release. > > the branch will last until well after 3.0 is released.
That, and the "releases" are mainly for the packagers sake: i.e., giving the packagers a snapshot to use as a reference. A stable branch like 2_2 should *always* be usable, and people are still rolling bugfixes and updates into it (hence my original question :-). So, to sum up, whether or not there is an official 2.2.3 or not is pretty irrelevant... - -- D.A.Bishop -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8GQ64EHLN/FXAbC0RAovaAKCcK1raK69ZZJvHVCfN2iVIrWW5AACfTCB3 kLfvDIepr83O77GUVZKsxAA= =tQa8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
