* Jarno Elonen schrieb am 08.01.02 um 20:32 Uhr: > > Just to let you know that I will *not* support anti-aliasing. You can > > use it, but don't expect me to urgently follow up on bug reports > > involving AA, as it causes problems such as #123264. If you report an AA > > bug, I'll probably downgrade its severity and tag wontfix, because it's > > too buggy. > > Ok, you're the boss now (;-) but whatever you do, please don't at least > disable AA *support*, leave it out of binary packages etc! > > It works very well at least on two computers I have tried so far and makes > the desktop a *lot* more usable - provided the following is in > XftConfig: > > # Many true type fonts are optimized for point size 9-12 > # and look clearer without AA in those sizes: > match any family == "*" edit antialias = true; > match all size > 8 all size < 13 edit antialias = false; >
I have the Problem here, that those "> 8 all size < 13" fonts are very ugly then (if AA is enabled). They are not AA and ugly. With AA disabled they look nice then... > (See http://iki.fi/elonen/devel/konq_aa.png for a screenshot. The page > title is antialiased as are the window title and small menu texts.) > > And bug #123264 for example (huge fonts in konsole after AA enabled) was very > easily fixed by just choosing the font manually from "[popup]/font/Custom...". > You could use the --noxft Option for that instead... > I don't think AA on KDE is particularily buggy and should, instead, be > considered quite an important feature if we want to eventually build a > desktop UI that can seriously compete with the commercial one(s). Look & feel > and usability are one of the areas we are most likely to fail in and > therefore requires extra attention, IMHO. > ACK but looking forward to QT3, too. -Marc -- +-O . . . o . . . O . . . o . . . O . . . ___ . . . O . . . o .-+ | Ein neuer Service von Links2Linux.de: / o\ RPMs for SuSE | | --> PackMan! <-- naeheres unter | __| and others | | http://packman.links2linux.de/ . . . O \__\ . . . O . . . O . |
