On Thursday 28 February 2002 14:03, Eray Ozkural wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thursday 28 February 2002 18:16, Magnus von Koeller wrote: > > On Thursday 28 February 2002 12:47, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > I have working qt3/kdelibs4/kdebase3 packages, as I stated, but I > > > am not releasing them to the public until they're fully tested. > > > > Well, what is unstable for, then? > > The KDE3 packages replace KDE2, therefore they cannot be released in a > buggy state without severely disappointing users. > > That is exactly why I wanted to prepare a set of binaries for people who > are eager to try KDE3 on their AMD systems but do not have the resources > to compile them. > > Though, now I think that the 800MB might be way too big. Even when I > compress them, it will probably take >400MB :/ I wanted to include the > debugging info, but then again it may be too big for transfer... > > Maybe I should compile one with -march=i686 (so that it runs on all > high-end x86 cpus) and with --disable-debug. > > Thanks, > > - -- Just a comment from one who is almost exclusively a KDE user and not a KDE developer. I do have one Athlon machine plus a couple K6 machines. My gut hunch is that those of us who do have such machines do have the physical resources for our machines. The willingness and/or technical deftness to do it is quite a different question though. (I'm definitely lacking the willingness right now and it would be a large technical challenge for me to do so.)
Bob
