m�ndagen den 16 september 2002 11.20 skrev David Pashley: > I'm sorry that just isn't true. KDE HEAD has been kept up to date as much > as possible. People have been able to build packages for 3.1 for the last > few months. I could check the dates if you are interested. We haven't > provided binary packages because a) they take up a lot of room and b) calc > has been busy making sure that 3.0.x is working, bab has been working on > koffice 1.2 and everyone else has been making sure that HEAD works. We have > never said that we will start for on 3.1 debs once 3.1 has been released.
Good you say it, since then I don't have to bother with building KDE 3.1 packages for others. Actually I never intended to and just made my own packages available, and was surprised by the demand. I am happy for the feedback I got on this list, and will improve my own packages and packaging technique. I have some plans and make small experiements on improvements, based on problems I have heard on this list, from all kind of KDE versions. If someone want my new packages for KDE 3.1 beta 2, when they come, I will make them available. But as you say, it is probably not needed since you already have done the work and hopefully will also provide binary packages. -- Karolina
