These are collective effort of debian-kde developers, but are built from post-beta2 snapshot.
Seems like we have a choice now :-)
Has anyone compared the two sets of Debian KDE 3.1 Beta 2 packages?
Ralf's http://download.kde.org/unstable/kde-3.1-beta2/Debian/woody/
or Karolina's http://shakti.ath.cx/debian/kde3.1-beta2/These are forked off the ones above. They use different kdelibs packaging, so they are upgrade-incompatible with former.
I used first set (i compiled them actually) with good enough results (there are some issues naturally, esp. with noatun/arts and korganizer, probably others). I cannot comment about Karolinas set, i only know they once had problems with .la files but i believe this was solved.
Apart from the way they are packaged is there any difference between these sets? And that one is built for woody and one for sid.
Are people getting good results on both?
There are chances that the Karolina's way of packaging kdelibs will be used in official debs, but i don't really know. Anyway, first set is what will go into sid when they are complete and when gcc-3.2 transition is over.
Mark
yenar
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
inetname: Yenar Calentaure
realname: Peter Rockai
mail: yenar(at)host.sk
homepage: http://yenar.host.sk
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The universe is entering maintenance mode in 2 minutes. Please logout.
-- Your administrator
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
